Fwd: ISI? Bad ISI! and now more

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/world/asia/pakistanis-tied-to-2007-attack-on-americans.html

The plot thickens or is it curdling?

This incident is from 2007, and just now getting coverage in the US press.

It seems we are spoon fed what 'they' want us to know.

This probably indicates the decision has already been made to cut the Packy's loose.

Or is it the Packy's have decided to cut the Empire loose?

In my first msg it is indicated my speculation the Packy's have cut a deal with China to pick up the slack

for the US Empire who has been paying big brides to Pakistan for years.

So if we are going to get and indication of where things are going for the RWB Empire in Afghanistan, i will

speculate this is as close an indication of the forced shift that is taking place.

And yes, the Empire is not winning either on the ground or at the bribing.

No one has mentioned that China is behind all of this and why should they?

But if we look at it from the money angle, billions are still billions and though the Pakyies may have felt insulted 

and don't like being bombed from drones. We'll billions are still billions.

So someone had to step in with a better deal that they could live with and i would think

Chinese money plus oil, plus essential equipment and the assurance that they had a ally in China

when dealing with India is allot of assurance that this is the time to change masters.

Pakistan may end up as a power in the region rather than land pirates as they now 

are considered.

Whats in it for China? How about bye, bye US Empire in Asia?

And this would open allot of other avenues for China heading towards the middle east.

Then theirs all those countries ending in 'Stan' and most of them have oil and minerals.

It looks tempting to me.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: larry 
Date: Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM
Subject: ISI? Bad ISI!


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/world/asia/mullen-asserts-pakistani-role-in-attack-on-us-embassy.html

We'll this maybe more contrived on the part of US intelligence and Pentagon than it appears.

They are not doing anything that will be effective to counter the ISI with these: "We are Shocked!" announcements;

that their dear ally Pakistan is playing other games besides the ones the US wants to play.

Are they going to go to war with Pakistan? I don't think so!

I can recall a couple of incidents in recent history and one such as the strafing of the USS Liberty in 67 by the Israels.

We just covered it up after the two Israel planes where driven off.

Casualties? was it 179 US sailors.? and it was no mistake of identity.

What has worked with Pakistan in the past has been bribes by the US ...and in the billions.

But i think Pakistan has it's own agenda with regards to Afghanistan and they just want the Empire out ASAP.

And we can be sure some discussion regarding the eviction of the Empire has taken place by other big players along with Pakistan.

Russia and China would probably be very logistically supportive of Pakistan as neither wants the US in Asia.

And I'm sure they would be more than supportive of Pakistan if it decides to be 'assertive' with the US.

Supportive might mean commodities such as oil and coal and industrial equipment. And these are all things the US doesn't have to give.

Pakistan has never been a US colony and their are few things Pakistan's wants or that they like about the 'Crusader Empire'.

So ISI being sloppy and giving operates cell phones to call them just doesn't sound like they didn't know who had what and where they where calling from.

I just don't think they care what the US knows or does as they see the US in the this area as history and they have the backing to know let the Pentagon and the CIA know it.

The Drones have been very effective but the Packy's don't like whats happening and they want total control and so they are upping the anty.