Fw: 911

I think the best use for information like this is to pass it along.
The more aware we the public are the less likely for them to do it again.
If Israel doesn't first use a false attack scenario before they bomb Iran
then we may experience some type of 'terrorist incident' in the U.S. to
justify our carpet bombing Iran.

And the response..."They would never do that!"
We'll, those buildings that came down on 9/11 apparently were demolished....
if we accept these engineers conclusions.
----- Original Message -----
From: olcharlie
To: larry
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:53 PM
Subject: 911

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 09, 2008
14 Structural Engineers Now Publicly Challenge Government's Explanation for
Destruction of the World Trade Center
A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of
hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former
member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the
National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council (Marx Ayres) believes
that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition (see
also this)

Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university
(Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade
Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)

Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering
from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:

"Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the
unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well
as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned
and controlled demolition"
Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in
Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:

"Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the ground in about 10
seconds, pulverizing the contents into dust and ash - twice. Why would all
47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds
the same day? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An
independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the
surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust."
Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:

"WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and
external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a
steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this
building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?"
Paul W. Mason, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia, argues:

"In my view, the chances of the three buildings collapsing symmetrically
into their own footprint, at freefall speed, by any other means than by
controlled demolition, are so remote that there is no other plausible
explanation!"
Mills M. Kay Mackey, structural engineer, of Denver, Colorado, points out:

"The force from the jets and the burning fuel could not have been
sufficient to make the building collapse. Why doesn't the media mention that
the 11th floor was completely immolated on February 13th, 1975? It had the
weight of nearly 100 stories on top of it but it did not collapse?"
Haluk Akol, Structural Engineer and architect (ret.)

Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas (and see this)

Dennis Kollar, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)

Michael T. Donly, P.E., structural engineer

William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College

There are many other structural engineers who have questioned the
government's account in private. We support them and wish them courage to
discuss these vital issues publicly.