Wikipedia for a start) And everyone should now since they openly manipulate
our foreign policy for their own gain.
Aubie has sent me his mkt news letter on the equities market for years. And
every so often i get a message that is very reveling such as this one
enclosed below..
It seems the Zionist would prefer McCain but they will gladly take Hilary
since she
is also a proven supporter.
Aubie is further stating Obama is the true threat to the Zionist as he says
he will end the
middle east war adventures and which are not just about oil but defending
the
Zionist who are in control in Israel.
What may defeat the Zionist is the wars are now estimated to be costing the
U.S. over
a trillion and going toward 2 trillion and that's our money not Israelis as
they get their war funds from us the u.s. tax payer.
This is bankrupting the U.S. as it is us who are actually fighting the
Zionist
expansionist wars. What the Zionist have achieved is getting the U.S. empire
to fight their wars and then get paid for letting us die for them.
As a patriot and registered Republican who supports Ron Paul I will support
Obama if
Paul unfortunately drops out.
Issues to consider: Is supporting the Zionist worth the cost of the lives we
are loosing in the middle east wars (4000) and the U.S. military who have
been wounded (30,000)?
And as too the number of civilians killed and wounded it's in the hundreds
of thousands.
Is the loss of our national social services and education funds which are
deferred to
the military worth defending the Zionist for?
Along with soon no retirement funds or health care. Forty some millions
Americans are now with out any health care and the quality of U.S. medical
care is not a world leader by a long way.
And the current gas pump prices which reflect the loss of the dollars value
to inflation worth it to you to finance the Zionists continuing wars with
their neighboring countries.
For me i sure don't support them on any issue as they are without
justification in any of their genocidal actions towards the people who 'had'
lived in Palestine for thousands of years and are now driven off their land
by
the European Zionist Jews.
So the next time you are filling the tank on the car that maybe owned by the
bank and you notice the price per gallon just keeps going up. Ask yourself
did we make a good deal by supporting the 2 wars and aswell the Zionist who
also came up with the 'weapons of mass destruction' hoax......for what we
where told would be cheap gas.
It looks tome like this nation is now following the on going real estate
bubble right in to a national disaster. Recession is going tobe a stepping
stone to economic depression.
And so far the only winner has been the Israel Zionist.
this is not the first time we made deals with repressive regimes to achieve
questionable goals.
We made a pact with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to defend the rulers from
their neighbors and their own people for their supplying us with cheap oil.
This was in 1946 and that was our source of cheap oil up until recently.
This was an open signed agreement but the deal with the Zionist is under the
table and we are paying for the right to die for their religious craziness.
Not all Jews are Zionist by a long ways. And some of the Jews who are not
Zionist are very vocal about what they consider will be a disaster for the
Jews now living in Israel aswell as the Palestine's in the concentration
camps. And of course our own national economic disasture from supporting the
Zionist. And yes, the Zionist do have 250 nucleare missles. But we must not
talk about that.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: OBAMA
>
> Marc Zell , THE JERUSALEM POST
>
> Feb. 21, 2008
> Less than two weeks before the critical primary
> elections in Ohio and Texas, Democratic voters have
> made it very clear: Barack Hussein Obama is for real.
> Leading in the popular votes cast, delegates pledged
> and total delegates (meaning principally the back-room
> machers euphemistically referred to as
> "superdelegates"), Obama has a decent chance to become
> the 2008 Democratic candidate for President of the
> United States. Obama has become a rallying point for
> millions of disgruntled voters who yearn for a new
> style of politics in the world's greatest democracy.
> Since the Republican race is all but over and Senator
> John McCain will likely win the nomination of his
> party in Minneapolis in early September, it is not
> idle speculation to consider an Obama-McCain contest
> in the November general election. Such a contest has
> potentially enormous consequences for Israel and the
> Jews.
> It is no secret that Obama's candidacy has been
> supported financially and politically by many
> prominent members of the American Jewish community.
> Even previously outspoken Clinton-supporting
> spokespersons for Democrats Abroad here in Israel have
> been hedging their bets recently in articles and
> interviews, suggesting that an Obama Administration
> would augur well for Israel. Incredibly, citing
> unenthusiastic, canned pro-Israel campaign statements,
> these dyed-in-the-wool Democratic sycophants would
> urge Jewish voters to cast their fate and Israel's
> with Obama rather than with the Republican candidate,
> McCain.
> With all due deference to the Obama celebrity
> supporters like Steven Spielberg and George Soros, can
> Jews herein Israel and in America and other friends of
> Israel risk a vote for Obama in November? A quick look
> at the facts should switch on a big red light in most
> peoples' minds.
> First and foremost among the considerations that
> should trouble friends of Israel is the foreign policy
> team Obama has selected to advise him. The composition
> of a candidate's advisory panel is usually a very good
> indicator of where the candidate will come out on the
> issues if elected.
> This was the test this writer applied to George W.
> Bush in 2000 at a time when most pundits in Israel and
> in the Jewish community predicted that his Middle East
> policy would be a carbon copy of his father's, meaning
> trouble for Israel. But Bush, the son, had selected a
> blue-ribbon team of pragmatic and conservative
> advisors whose views on the Middle East were markedly
> pro-Israel and pro-democracy. Subsequently, the W.
> Bush Era became among the closest allies of Israel in
> her 60-year history.
> The opposite is the case with the Obama team. Headed
> up by Jimmy Carter's ("Israel is an apartheid state")
> national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski,
> Obama's team includes such problematic figures as
> Anthony Lake, Robert O. Malley and Susan Rice.
> One commentator, citing an article by the staunchly
> left-wing Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, has noted that
> an Obama presidency including a foreign policy team
> that included the foregoing and their ideological
> soul-mates, "would likely have an approach towards
> Israel radically at odds with those of previous
> Presidents (both Republican and Democrat)" and is the
> candidate apt to be "least supportive" of Israel.
> Brzezinski has been disseminating vitriol about Israel
> for three decades and recently publicly defended the
> Walt-Mearsheimer study which concluded that US policy
> towards Israel was the result of Jewish pressure and
> inconsistent with American interests. More recently
> Brzezinski called for the US to initiate dialogue with
> Hamas, described Israel's action in the Second Lebanon
> War as a killing campaign against civilian hostages
> and earlier this month made a trip to confer with
> Syria's President Assad, ostensibly unbeknownst to the
> Obama campaign.
> Robert O. Malley, another former Carter Administration
> diplomat and President Clinton's special advisor on
> Arab-Israeli affairs, is an unabashed advocate for the
> Palestinians, co-authoring a spate of anti-Israel
> propaganda with former Arafat advisor, Hussein Agha,
> including a tract that blames Israel for the failure
> of the 2000 Camp David talks and another piece which
> blames the Bush Administration for continuing
> Israeli-Palestinian strife.
> And then there is Susan Rice, foreign policy advisor
> to the ill-fated John Kerry presidential campaign in
> 2004, where she concocted the idea of solving the
> Middle East problem by appointing none other than
> Jimmy Carter and James Baker as negotiators, an idea
> which was later repudiated by her own boss as being
> unbalanced against Israel. Nor are these the only "bad
> apples" in Obama's foreign policy binââ,¬Â¦
> Another problematic indicator is candidate's close
> association with Jeremiah Wright, Jr., pastor of the
> Trinity United Community Church (a member of the
> United Church for Christ, which itself has been
> rebuked for anti-Israel bias), who is well known for
> his virulent anti-Israel remarks, including a call for
> a divestment campaign against Israel for the
> "injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians
> have lived because of Zionism."
> Nor should bring much solace to Jewish voters and
> friends of Israel that Reverend Wright counts among
> his closest friends, the nefarious anti-Semite, Louis
> Farrakhan for whom Judaism is a "gutter religion" and
> Jews are "bloodsuckers." Obama could have picked any
> one of hundreds of churches in Chicago's South Side;
> he picked Jeremiah Wright's parsonage, which awarded
> Farrakhan with the Jeremiah Wright Lifetime
> Achievement Trumpeteer Award in 2007. And Wright's
> church is the single largest beneficiary of Obama's
> charitable giving. Even Jewish columnist Richard Cohen
> of the Washington Post felt compelled to ask Obama to
> clarify his relationship with these anti-Jewish and
> anti-Israel community leaders, questioning why Obama
> has stayed steadfast in his allegiance to Pastor
> Wright over the years.
> Obama is only a first-term senator and has therefore
> only participated in a handful of votes that bear upon
> Israel and the Middle East. He also has a penchant for
> missing controversial votes where he would have to put
> his personal policies in the public record. However,
> his public statements on a variety of issues present a
> number of troubling issues for Jews and friends of
> Israel. Here are a few samples:
> 1)Obama openly advocates outreach toward and
> diplomatic engagement of Iran even though Iran has
> recently referred to Israel as a "filthy bacteria" and
> has repeatedly called for the annihilation of the
> Jewish State, including recent hints that this will be
> accomplished by a nuclear attack
> 2) "Nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian
> people."
> 3)"[T]he creation of a wall [referring to Israel's
> security fence] dividing the two nations is yet
> another example of the neglect of this [the Bush]
> Administration in brokering peaceââ,¬Â¦ ."
> 4)"I am opposed to the cynical attempt by Richard
> Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend
> warriors in the administration to shove their
> ideological agenda down our throat." [note that only
> Jews are singled out despite the fact that the
> policies in question were promoted by the entire
> Administration]
> 5)"Reverend [Al] Sharpton is a voice for the
> voiceless, and a voice for the dispossessed. What
> [Reveren d Sharpton's] National Action Network has
> done is so important to change America, and it must be
> changed from the bottom up." [National Action lead a
> protest against the Jewish owner of Freddy's Fashion
> Mart in New York in which picketers, sometimes joined
> by Sharpton himself, repeatedly screamed epithets
> about "bloodsucking Jews" and "Jew bastards."]
> Obama was the only Democratic candidate who said the
> onus was on Israel to change its policies vis-Ãf -vis
> the Palestinians in order to achieve peace.
> Barack's problematic and unrecanted public statements
> and associations raise enough serious questions that
> should cause Jewish voters and friends of Israel to
> think twice about supporting him in November.
> But there is one other troublesome factor that voters
> in the Democratic primaries have thus far failed to
> credit seriously, viz.: Obama aspires to become
> president of the greatest democracy and still the only
> remaining superpower on the planet, having held a
> senate seat for less than five years and having had no
> previous administrative or national experience.
> While it may have suited Democratic voters to cast
> their votes for Obama during the primaries as a
> protest against the Democratic political establishment
> (much as they did in 2006 to deny (now Independent)
> Senator Joseph Lieberman the nomination of his party
> for the Senate seat from Connecticut), one would like
> to think that the American electorate will again
> demonstrate its maturity and seriousness during the
> General Elections in November 2008, when their votes
> really count.
> The Presidency in this day and age is no place for a
> neophyte, however charismatic. Those of us Americans
> who live in the Jewish State clearly understand what
> is at stake and what kind of risk Obama poses to the
> region and the world. There is every reason to hope
> that our compatriots in the United States and friends
> of Israel and freedom generally would agree
>
No comments:
Post a Comment